← Back to research center 中文

2026 World Cup · Score Research

06-12 03:00 CST · World Cup Group Stage · Separate HT/FT models

Me

Mexico

Home side / left blind-prior direction

Full-time first pick 2:1 Probability 13.6% · Standard score cluster Half-time first pick 0:0 (40.9%)
So

South Africa

Away side / right blind-prior direction

Five-Factor Read

1. No-market strength Mexico side rates higher

This is a pre-match blind record; the rank, venue and historical-market prior leans toward Mexico. The match result was not read.

2. Form and pace 0:0

HT first pick is 0:0 (40.9%); HT draw probability is 49.0%, so the model still respects early caution.

3. H2H and goal environment FT total 2.50

The total line and model distribution lean low-scoring, with density around 0-0, 1-0, 1-1 and 2-1.

4. Venue factor host edge / normal weather

Venue: 墨西哥城体育场. Non-neutral venue. Weather/temperature: 天晴, 23℃. Mexico has a domestic-tournament setting here; treat it as a small crowd/familiarity edge, not a standalone reason to override the market. Weather and temperature do not show a clear tempo-suppression signal. Together with the totals line and Under 3.5 probability, the venue layer supports a lower-tempo or lower-margin script rather than pushing the score upward.

5. Sample and soft factors Pre-match blind record

This prediction is stored as a pre-match blind record; historical odds and results are used only for later review

Full-Time Score Distribution

2:1 13.6%
2:0 11.7%
1:0 11.4%
3:0 7.7%
3:1 7.1%
1:1 14.6%
FT blind baseline: side line 1.25 · total 2.50 · Bucket blind_prior:ah_ou:1.25/2.5
Score cluster: pending

Half-Time Score Distribution

0:0 40.9%
1:0 26.4%
0:1 10.8%
1:1 7.6%
2:0 6.8%
2:1 2.1%
HT blind baseline: side line 0.50 · total 1.25
Mexico win64.7%
Draw26.0%
South Africa win9.3%
Mexico expected goals1.98
South Africa expected goals0.79
Under 3.571.5%
FT temperature0.90
Empirical weight29.8%
Sample size34
Europe 1X2not used

Key Variables

First-goal path Mexico benefits most from opening the scoring; if HT stays 0:0, the FT distribution compresses toward lower scores.
Deciding factor Draw probability is 26.0%, so the exact-score set should keep draw and one-goal-margin scripts alive.
Risk point Under 3.5 is 71.5%; if the live total moves up materially, rerun the model.

Pre-Match Blind Record · Historical Odds Review

Recorded 2026-08-05 01:19:19 (started/finished about 1294h 20m ago)

FT pre-match baselineSide line 1.25 · total 2.5
HT pre-match baselineSide line 0.5 · total 1.25

Data boundary: this match is stored from a pre-match blind prediction and does not read the finished score. Historical odds and results are used only for later review and audit.

Use: keep already-tested blind predictions inside the full schedule report and review them consistently with later model versions.

Final Read: 2:1

Predicted side: Mexico win · Actual side: Mexico win · side aligned

This page is generated from a pre-match blind record: at prediction time it used schedule identity, team ranking, venue status and local historical distributions, without reading the match result. Historical odds are used only for later review. The model's full-time first pick for Mexico vs South Africa is 2:1 (13.6%). Mexico side rates higher. The total line and model distribution lean low-scoring, with density around 0-0, 1-0, 1-1 and 2-1. HT first pick is 0:0 (40.9%); HT draw probability is 49.0%, so the model still respects early caution. Exact-score outputs are probability rankings for pre-match research and review.

Risk note: exact scores are low-hit-rate events. The model output is a probability ranking, not a certainty; late market moves, lineups, red cards and early goals can reshape the distribution.

Sources

Feijing · schedule, results, Asian handicap, totals, half-time markets, Europe 1X2 · Local history database · historical market lines, full-time scores, half-time scores · DeepSeek · AI sidecar context, bounded candidate reweighting only · RotoWire · World Cup lineups, injuries and weather context · Wikipedia · group structure, advancement rules and schedule cross-checks