2026 World Cup · Score Research

06-14 09:00 CST · World Cup Group Stage · Separate HT/FT models

Haiti

Home side / left market direction

Full-time first pick 1:2 Probability 14.9% · Standard score cluster Standard score cluster: 1:2 14.9%; 1:1 13.6%; 1:3 9.2%; 1:4 5.8% Half-time first pick 0:0 (39.1%)

Scotland

Away side / right market direction

Five-Factor Read

1. Market strength Scotland side rates higher

The handicap leans toward Scotland; the market prices the away side as stronger.

2. Form and pace 0:0

HT first pick is 0:0 (39.1%); HT draw probability is 48.1%, so the model still respects early caution.

3. H2H and goal environment FT total 2.75

This match uses a team-style adjustment: historical goals for, goals against and match tempo classify the teams' attacking or defensive tendency. The signal only reweights candidate scores and does not override the market baseline by itself.

4. Venue factor neutral / normal weather

Venue: 波士顿球场. Neutral venue. Weather/temperature: 天晴, 15℃～16℃. Neither side has a clear host-country edge, so the venue read mainly removes normal home advantage and pushes the decision back to market, lineup and tournament context. Weather and temperature do not show a clear tempo-suppression signal. Together with the totals line, the venue layer can support a more open upper tail.

5. Sample and soft factors Usable sample

70 comparable matches; useful for probability ranking

Full-Time Score Distribution

1:2 14.9%

1:1 13.6%

1:3 9.2%

1:4 5.8%

2:2 6.0%

2:1 6.3%

0:1 6.4%

2:3 4.4%

FT market: side line -1.00 · total 2.75 · Bucket ah_ou:-1.0/3.0

Score cluster: Standard score cluster: 1:2 14.9%; 1:1 13.6%; 1:3 9.2%; 1:4 5.8%

Half-Time Score Distribution

0:0 39.1%

0:1 24.7%

1:0 10.9%

0:2 8.8%

1:1 8.7%

1:2 2.2%

0:3 1.7%

2:0 1.3%

HT market: side line -0.50 · total 1.25

Haiti win18.2%

Draw24.0%

Scotland win57.8%

Haiti expected goals1.22

Scotland expected goals2.05

Under 3.558.6%

FT temperature0.95

Empirical weight46.7%

Sample size70

Europe 1X2home 16.7% / draw 20.9% / away 62.5%

Key Variables

First-goal path Scotland benefits most from opening the scoring; if HT stays 0:0, the FT distribution compresses toward lower scores.

Deciding factor Draw probability is 24.0%, so the exact-score set should keep draw and one-goal-margin scripts alive.

Risk point Under 3.5 is 58.6%; if the live total moves up materially, rerun the model.

Pre-Match Update · Market Movement

Published 2026-06-13 23:39:28 CST (started/finished about 1240h 20m ago) | Snapshot window: 2026-06-13 23:39:28 -> 2026-06-13 23:39:28

First snapshotFT handicap -1 · total 2.75

Latest marketFT handicap -1 · total 2.75

Movement: FT handicap held at -1; FT total held at 2.75; HT handicap held at -0.5; HT total held at 1.25.

Pre-match note: Market movement is limited; keep the model ranking unless late odds or lineups change materially.

Final Read: 1:2

Predicted side: Scotland win · Actual side: Scotland win · side aligned

Using the full-time handicap, totals, comparable market buckets and half-time market, the model's full-time first pick for Haiti vs Scotland is 1:2 (14.9%). Scotland side rates higher. This match uses a team-style adjustment: historical goals for, goals against and match tempo classify the teams' attacking or defensive tendency. The signal only reweights candidate scores and does not override the market baseline by itself. HT first pick is 0:0 (39.1%); HT draw probability is 48.1%, so the model still respects early caution. Exact-score outputs are probability rankings for pre-match research and review.

Risk note: exact scores are low-hit-rate events. The model output is a probability ranking, not a certainty; late market moves, lineups, red cards and early goals can reshape the distribution.

Sources

Feijing · schedule, results, Asian handicap, totals, half-time markets, Europe 1X2 · Local history database · historical market lines, full-time scores, half-time scores · DeepSeek · AI sidecar context, bounded candidate reweighting only · RotoWire · World Cup lineups, injuries and weather context · Wikipedia · group structure, advancement rules and schedule cross-checks