← Back to research center 中文

2026 World Cup · Score Research

06-14 06:00 CST · World Cup Group Stage · Separate HT/FT models

Brazil

Home side / left market direction

Full-time first pick 1:1 Probability 27.3% · Standard score cluster Half-time first pick 0:0 (54.7%)

Morocco

Away side / right market direction

Five-Factor Read

1. Market strength Brazil side rates higher

The handicap leans toward Brazil; the market prices the home side as stronger.

2. Form and pace 0:0

HT first pick is 0:0 (54.7%); HT draw probability is 60.0%, so the model still respects early caution.

3. H2H and goal environment FT total 2.25

This match uses a mild World Cup tempo adjustment: finished-match replay suggests World Cup scores are slightly more open than the league baseline, so scorelines above two total goals receive a small lift without forcing a blowout.

4. Venue factor neutral / heat

Venue: 纽约/新泽西体育场. Neutral venue. Weather/temperature: 天晴, 30℃～31℃. Neither side has a clear host-country edge, so the venue read mainly removes normal home advantage and pushes the decision back to market, lineup and tournament context. Higher temperature raises fatigue risk and late-game tempo drop risk. Together with the totals line and Under 3.5 probability, the venue layer supports a lower-tempo or lower-margin script rather than pushing the score upward.

5. Sample and soft factors Usable sample

99 comparable matches; useful for probability ranking

Full-Time Score Distribution

1:1 27.3%

2:1 15.6%

3:1 8.1%

2:2 5.6%

1:0 7.0%

1:2 6.1%

2:0 5.2%

0:0 4.5%

FT market: side line 0.75 · total 2.25 · Bucket ah_ou:0.75/2.0

Score cluster: pending

Half-Time Score Distribution

0:0 54.7%

1:0 21.0%

0:1 11.1%

1:1 5.1%

2:0 2.9%

0:2 1.7%

2:1 1.2%

3:0 0.8%

HT market: side line 0.25 · total 1.00

Brazil win47.4%

Draw38.1%

Morocco win14.4%

Brazil expected goals1.68

Morocco expected goals1.09

Under 3.572.6%

FT temperature0.90

Empirical weight55.3%

Sample size99

Europe 1X2home 56.8% / draw 25.6% / away 17.6%

Key Variables

First-goal path Brazil benefits most from opening the scoring; if HT stays 0:0, the FT distribution compresses toward lower scores.

Deciding factor Draw probability is 38.1%, so the exact-score set should keep draw and one-goal-margin scripts alive.

Risk point Under 3.5 is 72.6%; if the live total moves up materially, rerun the model.

Pre-Match Update · Market Movement

Published 2026-06-13 23:39:28 CST (started/finished about 1243h 20m ago) | Snapshot window: 2026-06-13 01:03:48 -> 2026-06-13 23:39:28

First snapshotFT handicap 0.75 · total 2.25

Latest marketFT handicap 0.75 · total 2.25

Movement: FT handicap held at 0.75; FT total held at 2.25; HT handicap data pending; HT total data pending.

Pre-match note: Market movement is limited; keep the model ranking unless late odds or lineups change materially.

Final Read: 1:1

Predicted side: Brazil win · Actual side: draw · side missed

Using the full-time handicap, totals, comparable market buckets and half-time market, the model's full-time first pick for Brazil vs Morocco is 1:1 (27.3%). Brazil side rates higher. This match uses a mild World Cup tempo adjustment: finished-match replay suggests World Cup scores are slightly more open than the league baseline, so scorelines above two total goals receive a small lift without forcing a blowout. HT first pick is 0:0 (54.7%); HT draw probability is 60.0%, so the model still respects early caution. Exact-score outputs are probability rankings for pre-match research and review.

Risk note: exact scores are low-hit-rate events. The model output is a probability ranking, not a certainty; late market moves, lineups, red cards and early goals can reshape the distribution.

Sources

Feijing · schedule, results, Asian handicap, totals, half-time markets, Europe 1X2 · Local history database · historical market lines, full-time scores, half-time scores · DeepSeek · AI sidecar context, bounded candidate reweighting only · RotoWire · World Cup lineups, injuries and weather context · Wikipedia · group structure, advancement rules and schedule cross-checks