USL Championship · Score Research

07-23 07:00 CST · USL Championship · Separate HT/FT models

Lexington

Home side / left market direction

Full-time first pick 2:1 Probability 14.7% · Standard score cluster Standard score cluster: 2:1 14.7%; 3:1 7.8%; 3:2 5.8%; 4:2 4.1% Half-time first pick 0:0 (59.4%)

Oakland Roots

Away side / right market direction

Five-Factor Read

1. Market strength Lexington side rates higher

The handicap leans toward Lexington; the market prices the home side as stronger.

2. Form and pace 0:0

HT first pick is 0:0 (59.4%); HT draw probability is 64.0%, so the model still respects early caution.

3. AI Sidecar Read FT total 2.75

This match uses a DeepSeek AI sidecar factor. The AI signal only applies a small candidate-score reweighting and does not override the market/history main model by itself. AI note: 主队攻击略优但客队防守均衡，市场信任主队，预期小幅优势。

4. Venue factor Non-neutral venue

Venue: venue pending. Non-neutral venue. Weather/temperature: 间中有云, 22°C. The schedule marks this as non-neutral, so home/away identity remains a weak background factor. Weather and temperature do not show a clear tempo-suppression signal. Together with the totals line, the venue layer can support a more open upper tail.

5. Sample and soft factors Usable sample

168 comparable matches; useful for probability ranking

Full-Time Score Distribution

2:1 14.7%

3:1 7.8%

3:2 5.8%

4:2 4.1%

1:0 3.8%

2:0 3.3%

4:1 2.6%

5:1 2.2%

FT market: side line 0.50 · total 2.75 · Bucket ah_ou:0.5/3.0

Score cluster: Standard score cluster: 2:1 14.7%; 3:1 7.8%; 3:2 5.8%; 4:2 4.1%

Half-Time Score Distribution

0:0 59.4%

1:0 19.9%

0:1 9.1%

1:1 4.5%

2:0 2.7%

0:2 1.3%

2:1 1.1%

3:0 0.7%

HT market: side line 0.25 · total 1.25

Lexington win50.2%

Draw28.3%

Oakland Roots win21.5%

Lexington expected goals2.05

Oakland Roots expected goals1.47

Under 3.554.8%

FT temperature0.95

Empirical weight67.7%

Sample size168

Europe 1X2home 50.3% / draw 24.0% / away 25.7%

Key Variables

First-goal path Lexington benefits most from opening the scoring; if HT stays 0:0, the FT distribution compresses toward lower scores.

Deciding factor Draw probability is 28.3%, so the exact-score set should keep draw and one-goal-margin scripts alive.

Risk point Under 3.5 is 54.8%; if the live total moves up materially, rerun the model.

Pre-Match Update · Market Movement

Published 2026-08-05 01:19:19 CST (started/finished about 306h 20m ago) | Snapshot window: pending -> 2026-08-05 01:19:19

First snapshotFT handicap 待补 · total 待补

Latest marketFT handicap 0.5 · total 2.75

Movement: FT handicap data pending; FT total data pending; HT handicap data pending; HT total data pending.

Pre-match note: Market snapshots are thin; refresh Feijing data again before publishing the final pre-match version.

Final Read: 2:1

Predicted side: Lexington win · Actual side: Lexington win · side aligned

Using the full-time handicap, totals, comparable market buckets and half-time market, the model's full-time first pick for Lexington vs Oakland Roots is 2:1 (14.7%). Lexington side rates higher. This match uses a DeepSeek AI sidecar factor. The AI signal only applies a small candidate-score reweighting and does not override the market/history main model by itself. AI note: 主队攻击略优但客队防守均衡，市场信任主队，预期小幅优势。 HT first pick is 0:0 (59.4%); HT draw probability is 64.0%, so the model still respects early caution. Exact-score outputs are probability rankings for pre-match research and review.

Risk note: exact scores are low-hit-rate events. The model output is a probability ranking, not a certainty; late market moves, lineups, red cards and early goals can reshape the distribution.

Sources

Feijing · fixtures, results, Asian handicap, totals, half-time markets, Europe 1X2 · Local history database · historical market lines, full-time scores, half-time scores · DeepSeek · AI sidecar context, bounded candidate reweighting only